Perceived legitimacy can moderate the effect of proscriptive versus prescriptive injunctions on intentions to comply with UK government COVID‐19 guidelines and reactance: Study 1

    Dataset

    Lay Summary

    In Study 1 of this project, we examined the effect of including a proscriptive versus prescriptive injunction with information about UK government COVID-19 behavioral rules and guidance on intentions to comply with government guidelines, and examined perceived legitimacy of advice as a moderator, in a UK university sample. The results of Study 1 showed that a proscriptive injunction elicited lower intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines than a prescriptive injunction. The effect of Injunction Type on intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines was moderated by perceived legitimacy. When perceived legitimacy was low, the proscriptive injunction elicited lower intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines than did the prescriptive injunction. The findings have implications for the design of public health information.

    Type of Data

    Dataset

    Data Collection Method

    Surveys/Questionnaires
    Date made available2022
    PublisherKingston University
    Date of data production2020
    Geographical coverageUK

    Keywords

    • Public Health
    • Persuasion
    • Message Framing
    • Health communication

    Cite this