Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perceived legitimacy can moderate the effect of proscriptive versus prescriptive injunctions on intentions to comply with UK government COVID‐19 guidelines and reactance: Study 1

Dataset

Lay Summary

In Study 1 of this project, we examined the effect of including a proscriptive versus prescriptive injunction with information about UK government COVID-19 behavioral rules and guidance on intentions to comply with government guidelines, and examined perceived legitimacy of advice as a moderator, in a UK university sample. The results of Study 1 showed that a proscriptive injunction elicited lower intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines than a prescriptive injunction. The effect of Injunction Type on intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines was moderated by perceived legitimacy. When perceived legitimacy was low, the proscriptive injunction elicited lower intentions to comply with UK government COVID-19 guidelines than did the prescriptive injunction. The findings have implications for the design of public health information.

Type of Data

Dataset

Data Collection Method

Surveys/Questionnaires
Date made available2022
PublisherKingston University
Date of data production2020
Geographical coverageUK

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Persuasion
  • Message Framing
  • Health communication

Cite this