In the minds of men: social representations of war and military intervention

J. Christopher Cohrs, Emma O'Dwyer

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter reviews research on representations of war and military intervention, primarily situated in two different social psychological research traditions: individual attitudes and social representations. The former has approached the object of investigation by studying the cognitive and affective correlates, more general predictors, and behavioral consequences of individuals' support (vs. rejection) of war or military intervention. The latter focuses to a greater extent on contextual and historical processes that influence the social meanings attached to war and military intervention; in this approach attitudes are just one (evaluative) component of social representations ÔÇô and differences between individuals and groups may be attributed to the various functions social representations fulfill. We thus adopt the broader social representations approach. Based on this, the chapter closes by drawing implications for strategies to change individual attitudes as well as representations of war and military interventions, and by offering questions for future research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Social Psychology and Social Justice
    EditorsPhillip L. Hammack
    Place of PublicationOxford, U.K.
    PublisherOxford University Press
    Pages331-350
    ISBN (Print)9780199938735
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Publication series

    NameOxford library of psychology
    PublisherOxford University Press

    Keywords

    • Politics and international studies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In the minds of men: social representations of war and military intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this