Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of children and adults' judgements and decisions based on verbal uncertainty statements

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Children distinguish less well than adolescents the numerical meaning conveyed by verbal probabilities (e.g., Mullet & Rivet, 1991). Little is known, however, about children's ability to grasp the directionality of verbal probabilities (Teigen & Brun, 1995). We expected children to only be influenced by directionality and congruence of statement framing with their goal. Thirty children and 29 adults made probability judgements and decisions in a treasure hunt context. Results revealed that children are sensitive to the numerical meaning of verbal probabilities in decisions, and also in probability judgements related to goal-incongruent statement framings. The different demands implied by judging probabilities and decision-making will be discussed, as well as the independence of directionality and numerical value in adults' interpretation of verbal probabilities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
EditorsN. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, L. Schomaker, J. Nerbonne
Place of PublicationAustin, U.S.A.
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages1121-1126
ISBN (Print)9780976831853
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

Note: Published in Taatgen, N. & van Rijn, H. (eds.) (2009) Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp.1121-1126. Available at: http://www-abc.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/CogSci09/

Keywords

  • Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of children and adults' judgements and decisions based on verbal uncertainty statements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this