Agree to disagree: regulatory cooperation or hesitation in the EU and US

Steven Truxal

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

A closer look at the European and American competition rules reveals two divergent regulatory approaches guided by the respective ethoi of 'gentlemanly competition‘ and 'cowboy capitalism‘. The resulting behaviours of the individual and the sector also promote varying conventionalities of business strategy. The increased momentum of globalisation and positive comity in environments of regulatory flux (deregulation, privatisation and re-regulation) engenders regulatory risk that policymakers will self-protect or protect competitors rather than competition, thereby confusing the ends of the rules with their means.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2010
Externally publishedYes
EventSociety of Legal Scholars (SLS) Annual Conference 2010: Human Rights Act Ten Years On - Southampton, U.K.
Duration: 13 Sept 201016 Sept 2010

Conference

ConferenceSociety of Legal Scholars (SLS) Annual Conference 2010: Human Rights Act Ten Years On
Period13/09/1016/09/10

Bibliographical note

Organising Body: Society of Legal Scholars

Keywords

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agree to disagree: regulatory cooperation or hesitation in the EU and US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this