TY - CONF
T1 - An evaluation of bags-of-words and spatio-temporal shapes for action recognition
AU - Campos, Teofilo de
AU - Barnard, Mark
AU - Mikolajczyk, Krystian
AU - Kittler, Josef
AU - Yan, Fei
AU - Christmas, William
AU - Windridge, David
N1 - Note: Published in: 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). Piscataway, NJ : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. ISSN 1550-5790 ISBN 9781424494965
Organising Body: IEEE
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Bags-of-visual-Words (BoW) and Spatio-Temporal Shapes (STS) are two very popular approaches for action recognition from video. The former (BoW) is an un-structured global representation of videos which is built using a large set of local features. The latter (STS) uses a single feature located on a region of interest (where the actor is) in the video. Despite the popularity of these methods, no comparison between them has been done. Also, given that BoW and STS differ intrinsically in terms of context inclusion and globality/locality of operation, an appropriate evaluation framework has to be designed carefully. This paper compares these two approaches using four different datasets with varied degree of space-time specificity of the actions and varied relevance of the contextual background. We use the same local feature extraction method and the same classifier for both approaches. Further to BoW and STS, we also evaluated novel variations of BoW constrained in time or space. We observe that the STS approach leads to better results in all datasets whose background is of little relevance to action classification.
AB - Bags-of-visual-Words (BoW) and Spatio-Temporal Shapes (STS) are two very popular approaches for action recognition from video. The former (BoW) is an un-structured global representation of videos which is built using a large set of local features. The latter (STS) uses a single feature located on a region of interest (where the actor is) in the video. Despite the popularity of these methods, no comparison between them has been done. Also, given that BoW and STS differ intrinsically in terms of context inclusion and globality/locality of operation, an appropriate evaluation framework has to be designed carefully. This paper compares these two approaches using four different datasets with varied degree of space-time specificity of the actions and varied relevance of the contextual background. We use the same local feature extraction method and the same classifier for both approaches. Further to BoW and STS, we also evaluated novel variations of BoW constrained in time or space. We observe that the STS approach leads to better results in all datasets whose background is of little relevance to action classification.
KW - Computer science and informatics
U2 - 10.1109/WACV.2011.5711524
DO - 10.1109/WACV.2011.5711524
M3 - Paper
T2 - 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Y2 - 5 January 2011 through 7 January 2011
ER -