Attention, eye movement planning and number development in infancy: a cross-syndrome comparison

Jo Van Herwegen, Dean D'Souza, Tessa Dekker, Maja Rodic, Annette Karmiloff-Smith

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Numerous studies in animals, adult patients and typically developing infants have suggested that there are two kinds of independent cognitive systems for processing numbers: one for computing approximate numerosities and the other for calculating exact number. Studies focussing on adult patients and typically developing infants cannot determine whether the two specialised number systems are prespecified in the infant brain nor map the relationship between these systems in infancy and the outcome over developmental time, as both of the systems are present early in infancy in typical development. However, results from atypical populations, such as Williams syndrome and Down syndrome, will be discussed in order to shed further light upon these questions, arguing that cross-syndrome differences in large number processing in infancy are more predictive of later development of numerical abilities than small number processing. In addition, evidence from cross-syndrome differences in attention and eye-movement planning will be discussed in order to provide further insight into how domain-general differences impact on the specific number processing systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Sept 2011
    EventBritish Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference - Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
    Duration: 7 Sept 20119 Sept 2011

    Conference

    ConferenceBritish Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference
    Period7/09/119/09/11

    Bibliographical note

    Organising Body: British Psychological Society Developmental Section

    Keywords

    • Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Attention, eye movement planning and number development in infancy: a cross-syndrome comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this