Boundary objects of communism: assembling the Soviet past in museums and public spaces

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this article I argue that the organization theory perspective of boundary objects can usefully enrich the studies of the presentations of the communist past in the museum. I draw on Susan Lei Star‘s and James R. Griesemer‘s concept of boundary object to show how different objects and material structures are attributed to the communist era, assembled as cultural heritage and translated between different fields of professional expertise and institutional politics. Focusing on three cases of museums in Lithuania, I show that the museum expositions about the communist past should not be understood as a result of a linear, top-down dissemination of the official views endorsed by the governing elites. In contrast, I propose that these museums are better understood as sites that host many different social processes, where different groups compete over the management of boundaries of the relics of the communist past.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationOccupation and communism in Eastern European museums
    Subtitle of host publicationre-visualizing the recent past
    EditorsConstantin Iordachi, Peter Apor
    PublisherBloomsbury Academic
    ISBN (Print)9781350103726
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Keywords

    • History

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Boundary objects of communism: assembling the Soviet past in museums and public spaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this