Abstract
Background: People with intellectual disabilities are rarely involved in end-of-life decisions. This study investigated and further developed approaches and resources to enable inclusive end-of-life care planning. Methods: A multi-centre, multi-method four-phase study, involving 195 researchers, participants, advisors and co-design members, including 36 people with intellectual disabilities: (i) evidence review; (ii) stakeholder focus groups; (iii) Experience-Based Co-Design and (iv) testing of co-designed resources. Results: There was little empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of existing resources. Focus group participants signalled overwhelming support for inclusive end-of-life care planning but notable variance around where/what/when/who/how. The co-design group developed a toolkit of existing and new resources. Feedback from toolkit testers was positive but barriers to staff engagement through the testing period were noted. Conclusions: Flexible, creative and interactive approaches that open up conversations are the building blocks for inclusive end-of-life care planning. Barriers include lack of staff confidence, time and resources and a death avoidance culture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70019 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (JARID) |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 10 Feb 2025 |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- Allied health professions and studies
- shared decision making
- advance care planning
- end-of-life decisions
- palliative care
- intellectual disability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Co-designing a toolkit of approaches and resources for end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities within adult social care settings: a multi-phase study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver