TY - JOUR
T1 - Consentful-by-design
T2 - a perspective on safeguarding data ownership from generative AI leveraging lessons from the healthcare domain
AU - Linardos, Akis
AU - Willem, Theresa
AU - Buyx, Alena
AU - Hossain, Showkot
AU - Jung, Taeho
AU - Makris, Dimitrios
AU - Bakas, Spyridon
PY - 2025/12/13
Y1 - 2025/12/13
N2 - Research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) is lined with moral considerations. In healthcare, a high-risk field, sub-fields have emerged to mitigate AI-specific ethical issues such as fairness and transparency. However, similar considerations remain unaddressed beyond healthcare, and as generative AI tools (‘GenAI’) reach lay audiences, this neglect yields ethical concerns. The present work focuses on learning from ethical considerations in healthcare to mitigate challenges of GenAI. We structure our proposed mitigation strategies around three of the five established biomedical and AI ethics principles (autonomy, transparency, beneficence), highlighting the risks GenAI poses for intellectual property owners (scraping of copyrighted data, unpaid labor, plagiarism, fraud). We propose concrete ways to affirm these principles on GenAI, using biomedical AI examples and the emerging frameworks they have sparked in domains of data ownership, federated learning, and data provenance. This article comes at a pivotal time for AI, generalizing ethics-aware principles to GenAI to open new research avenues toward responsible AI.
AB - Research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) is lined with moral considerations. In healthcare, a high-risk field, sub-fields have emerged to mitigate AI-specific ethical issues such as fairness and transparency. However, similar considerations remain unaddressed beyond healthcare, and as generative AI tools (‘GenAI’) reach lay audiences, this neglect yields ethical concerns. The present work focuses on learning from ethical considerations in healthcare to mitigate challenges of GenAI. We structure our proposed mitigation strategies around three of the five established biomedical and AI ethics principles (autonomy, transparency, beneficence), highlighting the risks GenAI poses for intellectual property owners (scraping of copyrighted data, unpaid labor, plagiarism, fraud). We propose concrete ways to affirm these principles on GenAI, using biomedical AI examples and the emerging frameworks they have sparked in domains of data ownership, federated learning, and data provenance. This article comes at a pivotal time for AI, generalizing ethics-aware principles to GenAI to open new research avenues toward responsible AI.
M3 - Article
SN - 0951-5666
JO - AI & Society
JF - AI & Society
ER -