Correction: peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau; Ana Wheelock; Tushna Vandrevala; Priscilla Harries

doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0

Correction: peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Kingston University
Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

In this article the author name Priscilla Harries was incorrectly written as Priscilla Harris. The original article has been corrected. In this article the funding from 'National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust' was omitted. The original article has been corrected.

Original language	English
Article number	145
Journal	Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Volume	9
Issue number	1
Early online date	19 Apr 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0
Publication status	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Access to Document

10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{0da40ba9128f4ffba276acc823c9b804,

title = "Correction: peer reviewers{\textquoteright} dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences",

abstract = "In this article the author name Priscilla Harries was incorrectly written as Priscilla Harris. The original article has been corrected. In this article the funding from 'National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King{\textquoteright}s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust' was omitted. The original article has been corrected.",

author = "Ga{\"e}lle Vall{\'e}e-Tourangeau and Ana Wheelock and Tushna Vandrevala and Priscilla Harries",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",

issn = "2662-9992",

number = "1",

}

Correction: peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences. / Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle; Wheelock, Ana; Vandrevala, Tushna et al.
In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 9, No. 1, 145, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction

T2 - peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

AU - Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle

AU - Wheelock, Ana

AU - Vandrevala, Tushna

AU - Harries, Priscilla

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In this article the author name Priscilla Harries was incorrectly written as Priscilla Harris. The original article has been corrected. In this article the funding from 'National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust' was omitted. The original article has been corrected.

AB - In this article the author name Priscilla Harries was incorrectly written as Priscilla Harris. The original article has been corrected. In this article the funding from 'National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust' was omitted. The original article has been corrected.

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0

DO - 10.1057/s41599-022-01153-0

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85128425864

SN - 2662-9992

VL - 9

JO - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

JF - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 145

ER -

Correction: peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this