Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact

Ade Adebajo, Rosemary Barber, Peter Beresford, Louca-Mai Brady, Jo Brett, Jim Elliott, David Evans, Kirstie L. Haywood, David Jones, Carole Mockford, Mary Nettle, Diana Rose, Tracey Williamson, Sophie Staniszewska

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    While patient and public involvement (PPI) in health and social care research has progressed successfully in the last decade, a range of difficulties with the evidence base exist, including poor understanding of the concept of impact, limited theorization and an absence of quantitative impact measurement. In this paper, we argue that a paradigm change towards robust measurement of the impact of involvement in research is needed to complement qualitative explorations. We argue that service users should be collaboratively involved in the conceptualization, theorization and development of instruments to measure PPI impact. We consider the key advantages measurement would bring in strengthening the PPI evidence base through a greater understanding of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)628-632
    JournalInternational Journal of Consumer Studies
    Volume35
    Issue number6
    Early online date13 Oct 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2011

    Keywords

    • patient and public involvement
    • measurement
    • impact
    • evidence base
    • health and social care research
    • Health services research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this