Abstract
This is not a Bob Dylan movie" ran the headline of Robert Sullivan's New York Times feature about I'm Not There, the 2007 Dylan biopic directed by Todd Haynes. In one sense, this is quite true: Dylan is depicted by six actors, between them portraying seven characters, yet none of these characters is named Bob Dylan. I argue, however, that I'm Not There is very much a Bob Dylan movie; contrary to the title, Bob Dylan is there. I frame my argument with reference to the notion of heteroglossia (Bakhtin 1981), as well as theories of authorship (Foucault 1984, Barthes 1977) and the authorization of biography (Renders 201 7). Although it focuses on a single film, my article feeds into broader discussions of identity construction in popular music biopics and the relationship between popular music biopics and other biographical texts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 88-106 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | IASPM Journal |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 30 Oct 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Authorization
- Authorship
- Biopic
- Bob Dylan
- Heteroglossia
- Todd Haynes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Even the ghost was more than one person": authorship and authorization in I'm Not There'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver