Expanded narratives of gentrification: mobility, infrastructure and urban change in 1970s London literature

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article revisits Ruth Glass's essay 'Aspects of Change' (1964), in which the urban sociologist reputedly coins the term gentrification. Whereas other readers are content merely to quote Glass's description of gentrification, I consider how she situates the phenomenon within a broader complex of urban change. Doing so, I suggest, provides a useful optic for considering later literary engagements with gentrification in London. I examine two fictional texts - Silvia Townsend Warner's The Innocent and the Guilty (1971) and Maureen Duffy's Capital (1975) - and argue that they follow Glass by providing 'expanded narratives' of gentrification. This narrative mode is distinctive for the way that it frames highly visible and seemingly localized phenomena, such as gentrification, within broader cultural, geographical and historical contexts, in order to ask larger questions about the nature of urbanity. A concern with mobility and infrastructure defines these expanded narratives, which illuminate how these aspects of the city shape perceptions of urban change. I conclude by outlining how expanded narratives might also provide the basis for a useful reading strategy which contrasts with the extractive procedures that characterize readings of Glass and certain scholarly approaches to urban literature.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-51
    JournalJournal of Urban Cultural Studies
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    Early online date19 Jul 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2023

    Keywords

    • Architecture and the built environment
    • London
    • Maureen Duffy
    • Silvia Townsend Warner
    • extractive reading
    • gentrification
    • infrastructure
    • mobility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Expanded narratives of gentrification: mobility, infrastructure and urban change in 1970s London literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this