Abstract
Family members (or health-care confidants) of incapacitated patients are often consultedby doctors when making life-prolongation decisions. Little research has beenconducted on confidants' views on life prolongation and advance care planning. This study investigated the health-care confidant's view on life prolongation and their involvement in being a potential decision-maker for their
relatives in the event of incapacitation. Confidants (N┬╝12) were interviewed and interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The analysis revealed three themes relating to their perception of being a potential decision-maker for a relative's life prolonging measures: ''good'' and ''bad'' death based on past experience and perceptions of quality of life, a sense that discussions were inappropriate at present, and strategies which might be used to encourage discussion. The implications of these findings for family involvement in life-prolongation decisions and how to encourage family discussions about life prolongation are discussed.
KEYWORDS: life-prolonging treatments; proxy decision-making; family decision-making; advance care planning
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-81 |
| Journal | Mortality |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2008 |
Keywords
- Psychology