Abstract
This thesis attempts to address a number of issues identified in the asset pricing and
corporate finance literature in relation to the role of idiosyncratic volatility. These
issues include the need to uncover the determinants of idiosyncratic volatility in the
UK equity market, examine its association with financial constraints and corporate
investment behaviour. The sample used in this thesis provide a comprehensive
evidence on the idiosyncratic volatility dynamics of the UK equity market, including
firms listed on both the main and the alternative exchange - the Alternative Investment
Market (AIM), which was established with a goal of helping small and growing firms
to raise capital with less regulatory cost.
In light with the findings of extant literature, the results presented in this thesis,
reinforces the ability of firm-specific in driving the cross-sectional variation in
idiosyncratic volatility for UK firms. Specifically, we find that the aggregate
idiosyncratic volatility in the UK financial market has been significantly lower after
the 2007-08 global financial crisis, which is a similar trend to that of US. Subsequently,
we observe that the crisis has led to a shift in the dynamics of firm fundamentals. Firms
with high idiosyncratic volatility after the financial crisis are firms operating in a non-regulated industry, firms that do not pay dividend and those with high book-to-market
ratio, small firm size, low earnings, and high previous period volatility. In line with
the mosaic of evidence, we suggest that the level of financial constraints faced by a
firm is associated with its idiosyncratic volatility. We empirically document that small
iv
and young firms have high idiosyncratic volatility, and this relationship is strengthened
as the financial constraints faced by a firm increases. In other words, financial
constraints act as a moderating factor in the firm size-idiosyncratic volatility, firm age-idiosyncratic volatility relationships.
The results in this thesis also support the implication of idiosyncratic volatility on
corporate investment behaviour. We examine this using a sample of firms listed on the
AIM. Our results support that increase in firm-specific uncertainty discourages firms
to invest in capital assets as 'real option' value is created by waiting. However, this is
not the case for firms with a higher competitive position in the market. Firms with high
market share or market power are able to exploit investment opportunities by investing
more amidst uncertainty. The tendency of firms with stronger competitive position to
extract monopolistic rents demonstrates a strategic response to increased competition.
Therefore, effective competition policies in the alternative exchange may encourage
firms with average competitive position to stimulate investment activity and thus
economic growth.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - Sept 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Physical Location: Online onlyKeywords
- Idiosyncratic Volatility
- Idiosyncratic Risk
- Firm-specific volatility
- UK equity market
- Financial constraints
- Competition
- Capital Investment
- Alternative Investment Market (AIM)
- Accounting and finance
PhD type
- Standard route