Gender and mode of assessment at university: should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?

Ruth Woodfield; Sarah Earl-Novell; Lucy Solomon

doi:10.1080/0260293042003243887

Gender and mode of assessment at university: should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?

Ruth Woodfield, Sarah Earl-Novell, Lucy Solomon

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	35-50
Journal	Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume	30
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243887
Publication status	Published - Jan 2005
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Education

Access to Document

10.1080/0260293042003243887

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003243887

Cite this

@article{9930cbd7a0f74ee8aa036e77f36d3839,

title = "Gender and mode of assessment at university: should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?",

keywords = "Education",

author = "Ruth Woodfield and Sarah Earl-Novell and Lucy Solomon",

year = "2005",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/0260293042003243887",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "35--50",

journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",

issn = "0260-2938",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender and mode of assessment at university

T2 - should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?

AU - Woodfield, Ruth

AU - Earl-Novell, Sarah

AU - Solomon, Lucy

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

KW - Education

U2 - 10.1080/0260293042003243887

DO - 10.1080/0260293042003243887

M3 - Article

SN - 0260-2938

VL - 30

SP - 35

EP - 50

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

IS - 1

ER -