Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma

Simon Locke

Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma

Simon Locke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92
Publication status	Published - Feb 1998
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Note: Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92

Keywords

discourse
origin

1 Paper

Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma
Locke, S., Feb 1998.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Cite this

@inproceedings{9992d6b236934132befe1f36359e2dc4,

title = "Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma",

keywords = "discourse, origin",

author = "Simon Locke",

note = "Note: Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92",

year = "1998",

month = feb,

language = "English",

booktitle = "Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Golem science and the public understanding of science

T2 - from deficit to dilemma

AU - Locke, Simon

N1 - Note: Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

KW - discourse

KW - origin

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Revised version published as: Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), pp. 75-92

ER -