Abstract
Historically, the subject of 'English' has often been associated with progressive teaching
styles; 'personal growth' as a pedagogical aim has been a strong thread running through
accounts of English teaching in England and Wales from the 1920s to the 1970s. From
1988, the 'disciplinary technologies' of the 'standards agenda', including detailed tables of
content standards, standardised assessments and prescriptive pedagogies, have played an
important role in shaping the subject. However, in 2008 standardised tests in English at
Key Stage Three were suddenly abolished in England, amid signs that the dominance of
the logic of standards was receding.
This Research Project examines the work of Key Stage Three English teachers in England
and explores their responses to shifting discourses on standards between October 2008 and
March 2010. The experiences of English teachers in Wales (where standardised tests were
purposefully abolished in 2005) are used as an illuminating comparator. Data was
generated from semi-structured interviews with teachers, lecturers and civil servants;
attendance at a subject association meeting for English teachers in London; and close
readings of curriculum and assessment documents from England and Wales. Grounded
Theory, supplemented by Situational Analysis (Clarke 2005), was used to analyse the data
and to theorise about the links between practice, policy and discourse.
The study concludes that the removal of standardised testing at Key Stage Three, in both
England and Wales, has widened teachers' pedagogical repertoires and has prompted a
more active and holistic engagement with literature, especially Shakespeare texts. It also
finds that in Wales, despite moves to grant teachers more autonomy to assess students, a
persistently performative discourse is pressurizing teachers to inflate grades and to
'fabricate' assessment data. In England -in spite of the abolition of SATs and the National
Strategies and an ostensibly less prescriptive curriculum - nationally generated standards
continue in a variety of forms, including standardised assessment grids from the Assessing
Pupils' Progress (APP) initiative. However, APP is non-statutory which means that
practitioners have an opportunity to shape their own assessment practices, particularly if
they develop the pedagogical connoisseurship to defend their choices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor of Education (EdD) |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Note: In partnership with Roehampton University.Physical Location: This item is held in stock at Kingston University Library.
Keywords
- Education
PhD type
- Standard route