Abstract
A critical reading of research literature relating to teaching and learning with technology in higher education reveals a number of shortcomings in how investigations are conceptualised, conducted and reported. Projects often lack clarity about the nature of the enhancement that technology is intended to bring about. Frequently there is no explicit discussion of assumptions and beliefs that underpin research studies and the approaches used to investigate the educational impact of technologies. This presentation summarises a number of the weaknesses identified in published studies and considers the implications. Some ways in which these limitations could be avoided through a more rigorous approach to undertaking research and evaluation studies are then outlined and discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies - Barcelona, Spain Duration: 7 Jul 2014 → 9 Jul 2014 |
Conference
| Conference | EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies |
|---|---|
| Period | 7/07/14 → 9/07/14 |
Bibliographical note
Note: This paper was published in EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 2014, pp.5397-5404. ISSN: 2340-1117.Organising Body: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development
Keywords
- learning
- research methods
- teaching
- evidence
- innovations
- technology
- Education
Research output
- 1 Conference contribution
-
Improving quality and validity in research and evaluation studies of learning technologies
Kirkwood, A. & Price, L., Jul 2014, This paper was published in EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 2014, pp.5397-5404. ISSN: 2340-1117. Organising Body: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development Organising Body: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development. IATED Academy, p. 5397-5404Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver