TY - JOUR
T1 - Informal carers of stroke survivors
T2 - factors influencing carers: a systematic review of quantitative studies
AU - Mackenzie, Ann
AU - Greenwood, Nan
AU - Cloud, Geoffrey C.
AU - Wilson, Nikki
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - PURPOSE: Despite increasing evidence of adverse effects on informal carers of caring for stroke survivors, little is known about the characteristics of carers and survivors that influence carer outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize factors influencing outcomes in carers of stroke survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of studies identified from English language medicine, nursing and psychology databases from 1996-2006 was carried out. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were identified. Studies from Europe and the USA investigating negative carer outcomes dominated. Carer psychological characteristics and survivor disability were shown to influence carer outcomes. However, the diversity of carers and outcomes investigated and differences in study timing post-stroke make generalizations difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in study design over the last two decades, atheoretical studies employing overlapping concepts and poorly defined participants still dominate. Future studies should have theoretical underpinning and should acknowledge the diversity of carers, survivors and their situations. In addition, future emphasis on positive carer outcomes may improve understanding of protective carer factors.
AB - PURPOSE: Despite increasing evidence of adverse effects on informal carers of caring for stroke survivors, little is known about the characteristics of carers and survivors that influence carer outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize factors influencing outcomes in carers of stroke survivors. METHODS: A systematic review of studies identified from English language medicine, nursing and psychology databases from 1996-2006 was carried out. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were identified. Studies from Europe and the USA investigating negative carer outcomes dominated. Carer psychological characteristics and survivor disability were shown to influence carer outcomes. However, the diversity of carers and outcomes investigated and differences in study timing post-stroke make generalizations difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in study design over the last two decades, atheoretical studies employing overlapping concepts and poorly defined participants still dominate. Future studies should have theoretical underpinning and should acknowledge the diversity of carers, survivors and their situations. In addition, future emphasis on positive carer outcomes may improve understanding of protective carer factors.
KW - Nursing and midwifery
UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19230230
U2 - 10.1080/09638280701602178
DO - 10.1080/09638280701602178
M3 - Article
C2 - 19230230
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 30
SP - 1329
EP - 1349
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 18
ER -