Is urinary continence considered in the assessment of older people after a fall in England and Wales? Cross-sectional clinical audit results

Rhodri Edwards, Finbarr C. Martin, Rob Grant, Derek Lowe, Jonathan Potter, Janet Husk, Adrian Wagg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate adherence to the urinary function assessments of the national falls guidelines for England and Wales. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the 2006 National Clinical Audit of Falls and Bone Health. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 years and older with a fragility fracture as a result of a fall. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were analysed to determine whether patients with fragility fractures received an assessment of urinary function including continence status; whether impairment was detected and if action was taken to prevent continence related falls. RESULTS: 63% (2009) of 3184 patients were assessed for urinary continence following a hip fracture and 41% (817) of these identified a problem. 21% (1187) of 5642 patients with nonhip fragility fractures were assessed and a problem was found in 27% (316). Hip fracture patients were more likely (p<0.0001) to receive a continence assessment and have problems detected. Only about half of those with problems had any intervention or a referral to a continence service. Admission to hospital for non-hip fracture patients was a strong predictor of being assessed (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rates of assessment and action for those with who fall and have continence problems are low despite current national guidelines.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-183
JournalMaturitas
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Nursing and midwifery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is urinary continence considered in the assessment of older people after a fall in England and Wales? Cross-sectional clinical audit results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this