Jones v Kaney and other disincentives: why the Supreme Court's decision should prompt a Law Commission review of the law in relation to expert witness evidence in family cases

Penny Cooper

Jones v Kaney and other disincentives: why the Supreme Court's decision should prompt a Law Commission review of the law in relation to expert witness evidence in family cases

Penny Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	234-250
Journal	Child and Family Law Quarterly
Volume	24
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - Jun 2012
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Note: Case commentary

Keywords

Law

Cite this

@article{49b8d75a5cf54cadbdb057bf052e8e55,

title = "Jones v Kaney and other disincentives: why the Supreme Court's decision should prompt a Law Commission review of the law in relation to expert witness evidence in family cases",

keywords = "Law",

author = "Penny Cooper",

note = "Note: Case commentary",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "234--250",

journal = "Child and Family Law Quarterly",

issn = "1358-8184",

publisher = "Jordans",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jones v Kaney and other disincentives

T2 - why the Supreme Court's decision should prompt a Law Commission review of the law in relation to expert witness evidence in family cases

AU - Cooper, Penny

N1 - Note: Case commentary

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

KW - Law

M3 - Article

SN - 1358-8184

VL - 24

SP - 234

EP - 250

JO - Child and Family Law Quarterly

JF - Child and Family Law Quarterly

IS - 2

ER -