Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception

Mircea Zloteanu

Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception

Mircea Zloteanu (Contributor)

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This talk provides a practical overview of the findings in "Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception" (Zloteanu, et al., 2022) investigating the effect of handcuffing suspects during police interviews. The research finds that a forensically-relevant situational factor can have substantial and detrimental effects on how random suspects are judged in terms of their honesty. This research highlights the need to strict and clear interviewing procedures.

Original language	English
Publication status	Published - 17 Apr 2023
Event	Surrey Police Evidence-Based Policing Conference - Guilford, U.K. Duration: 17 Apr 2023 → 17 Apr 2023

Conference

Conference	Surrey Police Evidence-Based Policing Conference
Period	17/04/23 → 17/04/23

Bibliographical note

Organising Body: Surrey Police

Keywords

Psychology
deception detection
handcuffing
police

Access to Document

Handcuffs - Surrey - 2023 - v2Other version, 8.62 MBLicence: Unspecified

1 Article

Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception
Zloteanu, M., Salman, N. L., Krumhuber, E. G. & Richardson, D. C., 31 Oct 2022, In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 19, 3, p. 231-247
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File

7 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

@conference{4da5f0e7cab4442587e0a2a2b9c2030a,

title = "Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception",

abstract = "This talk provides a practical overview of the findings in {"}Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception{"} (Zloteanu, et al., 2022) investigating the effect of handcuffing suspects during police interviews. The research finds that a forensically-relevant situational factor can have substantial and detrimental effects on how random suspects are judged in terms of their honesty. This research highlights the need to strict and clear interviewing procedures.",

keywords = "Psychology, deception detection, handcuffing, police",

author = "Mircea Zloteanu",

note = "Organising Body: Surrey Police; Surrey Police Evidence-Based Policing Conference ; Conference date: 17-04-2023 Through 17-04-2023",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

day = "17",

language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Looking guilty

T2 - Surrey Police Evidence-Based Policing Conference

A2 - Zloteanu, Mircea

N1 - Organising Body: Surrey Police

PY - 2023/4/17

Y1 - 2023/4/17

N2 - This talk provides a practical overview of the findings in "Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception" (Zloteanu, et al., 2022) investigating the effect of handcuffing suspects during police interviews. The research finds that a forensically-relevant situational factor can have substantial and detrimental effects on how random suspects are judged in terms of their honesty. This research highlights the need to strict and clear interviewing procedures.

AB - This talk provides a practical overview of the findings in "Looking guilty: Handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception" (Zloteanu, et al., 2022) investigating the effect of handcuffing suspects during police interviews. The research finds that a forensically-relevant situational factor can have substantial and detrimental effects on how random suspects are judged in terms of their honesty. This research highlights the need to strict and clear interviewing procedures.

KW - Psychology

KW - deception detection

KW - handcuffing

KW - police

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 17 April 2023 through 17 April 2023

ER -

Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception

Abstract

Conference

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Looking guilty: handcuffing suspects influences judgements of deception

Cite this