'Messy Democracy': democratic pedagogy and its discontents

Andy Broadey, Richard Hudson-Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reflects on a recent participatory installation by the artists' collective @.ac, entitled Messy Democracy, as a case study to raise questions concerning the 'distribution of the sensible' within the neoliberal art school. The project set up a quasi-autonomous artists' space within Hanover Project gallery 9 April-3 May, 2018 at University of Central Lancashire, Preston. This exhibition functioned as a space of collective pedagogy, co-labour and 'dissensus' situated in relation to the wider operation of the department of Fine Art. It also sought to operate as a critical alternative to contemporary models of the art school, rooted in notions of usefulness and romantic self-realisation, but re-structured in the service of 'commodification' and 'financialisation' in wake of the Browne Report (2010). Most importantly, Messy Democracy represented a 'theatocractic' 'undercommons' for alternate and counter-hegemonic subjectivities to emerge. However, hierarchical logics, resulting from the hegemonic 'distribution of the sensible' stubbornly persisted even within this nascent pedagogic democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-76
JournalResearch in Education
Volume104
Issue number1
Early online date16 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Art and design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Messy Democracy': democratic pedagogy and its discontents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this