TY - JOUR
T1 - Nurse-led case management for community dwelling older people
T2 - an explorative study of models and costs
AU - Gage, Heather
AU - Ting, Sharlene
AU - Williams, Peter
AU - Drennan, Vari
AU - Goodman, Claire
AU - Iliffe, Steven
AU - Manthorpe, Jill
AU - Davies, Sue L.
AU - Masey, Helen
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - AimÔÇé To compare community matrons with other nurses carrying out case management for impact on service use and costs. BackgroundÔÇé In England, nurses working in general practice, as district nurses and disease-specific nurses, undertake use case management. Community matrons were introduced to case management to reduce unplanned hospitalizations of people with complex conditions. MethodsÔÇé Managers in three Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) identified four nurses/matrons engaged in case management. Nurses/matrons recruited five community-dwelling patients referred to them for case management. Patients reported use of health/social services for 9ÔÇâmonths, 2008 to 2009. Nurses/matrons completed activity diaries. ResultsÔÇé Service use data were available for 33 patients. Compared with other nurse case managers, community matrons had: smaller caseloads; more patient contact time (mean 364 vs. 80ÔÇâminutes per patient per month); and older patients (mean age 81 vs. 75ÔÇâyears, PÔÇâ=ÔÇâ0.03) taking more medications (mean 8.9 vs. 5.6, PÔÇâ=ÔÇâ0.014). Monthly costs were significantly higher for patients managed by community matrons (add £861), and who lived alone (add £696). Hospitalizations were not associated with patient or service delivery factors. ConclusionÔÇé Further research on cost-effectiveness of case management models is required. Implications for Nursing ManagementÔÇé The case for continued investment in community matrons remains to be proven.
AB - AimÔÇé To compare community matrons with other nurses carrying out case management for impact on service use and costs. BackgroundÔÇé In England, nurses working in general practice, as district nurses and disease-specific nurses, undertake use case management. Community matrons were introduced to case management to reduce unplanned hospitalizations of people with complex conditions. MethodsÔÇé Managers in three Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) identified four nurses/matrons engaged in case management. Nurses/matrons recruited five community-dwelling patients referred to them for case management. Patients reported use of health/social services for 9ÔÇâmonths, 2008 to 2009. Nurses/matrons completed activity diaries. ResultsÔÇé Service use data were available for 33 patients. Compared with other nurse case managers, community matrons had: smaller caseloads; more patient contact time (mean 364 vs. 80ÔÇâminutes per patient per month); and older patients (mean age 81 vs. 75ÔÇâyears, PÔÇâ=ÔÇâ0.03) taking more medications (mean 8.9 vs. 5.6, PÔÇâ=ÔÇâ0.014). Monthly costs were significantly higher for patients managed by community matrons (add £861), and who lived alone (add £696). Hospitalizations were not associated with patient or service delivery factors. ConclusionÔÇé Further research on cost-effectiveness of case management models is required. Implications for Nursing ManagementÔÇé The case for continued investment in community matrons remains to be proven.
KW - Nursing and midwifery
UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339509
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01379.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01379.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 23339509
SN - 0966-0429
VL - 21
SP - 191
EP - 201
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
JF - Journal of Nursing Management
IS - 2
ER -