Offline factors influencing the online safety of adolescents with family vulnerabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Online safety guidance is frequently delivered as a specialist technology issue without considering adolescents’ home lives, offline vulnerabilities, or wellbeing. Yet, while the digital world offers connection, autonomy, and entertainment, vulnerable teens also encounter more violent content, sexual exploitation, and content concerning body image, self-harm or suicide than their non-vulnerable peers. Many struggle with social inclusion or less engaged and credible caregiver e-safety support, which may contribute to their negative experiences online. To improve their online safety and resilience, caregivers and educators might consider offline factors that can mediate exposure to online harms. This study compared the experiences of 213 adolescents with family vulnerabilities to 213 age- and gender-matched non-vulnerable adolescents. The contribution of (a) e-safety education, (b) close friendships, (c) a trusted adult at school, and (d) life-affecting worry was considered. No differences were found for exposure to, or engagement with, e-safety education. However, despite having received e-safety education, those with family vulnerabilities were more at risk of encountering severe online harms. This was mediated by life-affecting worry and parental e-safety guidance. These findings provide unique insights into the impact of family vulnerabilities on adolescents’ exposure to online harms and suggest a more holistic intervention framework for caregivers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number392
JournalSocial Sciences
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • digital competencies
  • e-safety
  • online risks
  • online safety
  • parental support
  • resilience
  • vulnerable children

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Offline factors influencing the online safety of adolescents with family vulnerabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this