Peer reviewer's dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau; Ana Wheelock; Tushna Vandrevala; Priscilla Harris

doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6

Peer reviewer's dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
, Ana Wheelock
, Tushna Vandrevala
, Priscilla Harris

Kingston University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Article number	70
Journal	Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Volume	9
Early online date	4 Mar 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6
Publication status	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Note: The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust Research on Research Award grant number 214532/Z/18/Z. Priscilla Harries is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South
London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

Keywords

Business and management studies

Access to Document

10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6

Vallee-Tourangeau-G-50989-VoRFinal published version, 486 KBLicence: CC BY

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6

Cite this

@article{a88781ce33244ae79bf64479fd213a40,

title = "Peer reviewer's dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences",

keywords = "Business and management studies",

author = "Ga{\"e}lle Vall{\'e}e-Tourangeau and Ana Wheelock and Tushna Vandrevala and Priscilla Harris",

note = "Note: The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust Research on Research Award grant number 214532/Z/18/Z. Priscilla Harries is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",

issn = "2055-1045",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

Peer reviewer's dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences. / Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle; Wheelock, Ana; Vandrevala, Tushna et al.
In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 9, 70, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer reviewer's dilemmas

T2 - a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

AU - Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle

AU - Wheelock, Ana

AU - Vandrevala, Tushna

AU - Harris, Priscilla

N1 - Note: The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust Research on Research Award grant number 214532/Z/18/Z. Priscilla Harries is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

KW - Business and management studies

UR - https://www.nature.com/palcomms

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6

DO - 10.1057/s41599-022-01050-6

M3 - Article

SN - 2055-1045

VL - 9

JO - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

JF - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

M1 - 70

ER -

Peer reviewer's dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this