Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pesticide contamination in apicultural products: an updated and comprehensive review of analytical methods, occurrence, and safety concerns

  • Adrián Fuente-Ballesteros
  • , Maj Smerkol
  • , Anton Gradišek
  • , Artur Sarmento
  • , Julie Fourrier
  • , Mila Arapcheska
  • , Zehra Hajrulai-Musliu
  • , Filip Franeta
  • , Željko Milovac
  • , Sonja Gvozdenac
  • , Nesrin İçli
  • , Harun Kurtagić
  • , Ina Pasho
  • , Elena Zioga
  • , Beatriz I. Vazquez
  • , Damir Pavliček
  • , Rosa Busquets
  • , Jelena Ciric
  • , Nurinisa Esenbuga
  • , Miriam Cavaco
  • Helena Rodrigues, Rosa Ferreira, Marta Leite, Zane Lace, Ana M. Ares, José Bernal, Iveta Pugajeva
  • University of Valladolid
  • Jožef Stefan Institute
  • University of Coimbra
  • ITSAP‑Institut de L’abeille
  • St. Kliment Ohridski University
  • University of Belgrade
  • University of Novi Sad
  • Kastamonu University
  • Federal Institute of Agriculture Sarajevo
  • University of Tirana
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • University of Santiago de Compostela
  • Croatian Veterinary Institute
  • Kingston University
  • Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology
  • Ataturk University
  • National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinary Research (INIAV IP)
  • University of Lisbon
  • University of Porto
  • 6º Andar
  • Institute of Food Safety Animal Health and Environment

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Honeybees and their products integrate landscape-level chemical exposure, making apicultural matrices valuable bioindicators for both food safety and environmental monitoring. This review summarizes current knowledge on pesticide residues in honey, pollen, beebread, beeswax, royal jelly, and propolis from 2019 to 2024, with an overview of analytical methodologies used in their determination. Multi-residue methods remain dominated by Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) extraction combined with liquid and gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, while high-resolution MS enables broader screening. Highly polar pesticides, particularly glyphosate and its metabolites, require specialised single-residue approaches, such as the Quick Polar Pesticides (QuPPe) method and ion chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (IC-HRMS). Co-occurrence patterns frequently involve mixtures of neonicotinoids, acaricides, and fungicides, reflecting combined agricultural and in-hive treatments. Regarding matrices, honey typically shows insecticide and acaricide residues, pollen concentrates fungicides and insecticides as the main exposure route, and beeswax acts as a long-term sink for lipophilic compounds; royal jelly generally exhibits the lowest contamination levels. Although exceedances of Maximum Residue Limits in honey remain uncommon in European monitoring programs, the presence of pesticide mixtures and limited residue data for bee-related products beyond honey raise concern. Future research should prioritize harmonized residue limits for all beekeeping matrices, standardized quality control and reporting practices, targeted mixture-toxicity assessment under realistic co-exposure scenarios, and the broader adoption of green, miniaturized, and matrix-tailored sample preparation strategies to enhance sensitivity, sustainability, and comparability across studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere00300
Number of pages14
JournalTrends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Volume49
Early online date10 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Analytical methods
  • Apicultural products
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Food safety
  • Honey
  • Mass spectrometry
  • Pesticide residues
  • Plant Protection Products

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pesticide contamination in apicultural products: an updated and comprehensive review of analytical methods, occurrence, and safety concerns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this