Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article situates current debates about transdisciplinarity within the deeper history of academic disciplinarity, in its difference from the notions of inter- and multi-disciplinarity. It offers a brief typology and history of established conceptions of transdisciplinarity within science and technology studies. It then goes on to raise the question of the conceptual structure of transdisciplinary generality in the humanities, with respect to the incorporation of the 19th- and 20th-century German and French philosophical traditions into the anglophone humanities, under the name of 'theory'. It identifies two distinct - dialectical and anti-dialectical, or dialectical and transversal - transdisciplinary trajectories. It locates the various contributions to the special issue of which it is the introduction within this conceptual field, drawing attention to the distinct contribution of the French debates about structuralism and its aftermath - those by Serres, Foucault, Derrida, Guattari and Latour, in particular. It concludes with an appendix on Foucault's place within current debates about disciplinarity and academic disciplines.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-35
    JournalTheory, Culture & Society
    Volume32
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2015

    Bibliographical note

    Note: This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council [grant number AH/I004378/1]. Part of a special issue entitled: Transdisciplinary Problematics, edited by Peter Osborne, Stella Sandford and Eric Alliez.

    Keywords

    • Philosophy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this