Profit maximization, industry structure, and competition: A critique of neoclassical theory

Steve Keen, Russell Standish

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Neoclassical economics has two theories of competition between profit-maximizing firms--Marshallian and Cournot-Nash--that start from different premises about the degree of strategic interaction between firms, yet reach the same result, that market price falls as the number of firms in an industry increases. The Marshallian argument is strictly false. We integrate the different premises, and establish that the optimal level of strategic interaction between competing firms is zero. Simulations support our analysis and reveal intriguing emergent behaviors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)81-85
    JournalPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    Volume370
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Bibliographical note

    Note: doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.032

    Keywords

    • Microeconomics Profit maximization Competition Monopoly Oligopoly Cournot-Nash game theory
    • Economics and econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Profit maximization, industry structure, and competition: A critique of neoclassical theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this