Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education

Lindsay Baker, Eileen Egan-Lee, Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis, Scott Reeves

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Interprofessional education (IPE) is considered a key mechanism in enhancing communication and practice among health care providers, optimizing participation in clinical decision making and improving the delivery of care. An important, though under-explored, factor connected to this form of education is the unequal power relations that exist between the health and the social care professions. Drawing on data from the evaluation of a large multi-site IPE initiative, we use Witz's model of professional closure (1992) to explore the perspectives and the experiences of participants and the power relations between them. A subset of interviews with a range of different professionals (n = 25) were inductively analyzed to generate emerging themes related to perceptions of professional closure and power. Findings from this work highlight how professionals' views of interprofessional interactions, behaviours and attitudes tend to either reinforce or attempt to restructure traditional power relationships within the context of an IPE initiative.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)98-104
    JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

    Keywords

    • Health services research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this