Abstract
This thesis explores the relationship between revolution and fascism. While
subjectivities produced by revolution are assumed to be inherently antifascist,
through a sustained analysis of contemporary theories of revolution and the
theory and praxis of Frantz Fanon, this thesis will argue that revolution's bio-
politics, Prometheanism and accelerated temporality inevitably cause
revolutionary projects to reproduce the very fascistic structures they intended to
dismantle. This thesis will conclude with an analysis of zapatismo, the theoretical
praxis of the zapatistas in Chiapas, Mexico. Arguing against reading zapatismo as
a classic Marxist revolutionary system or Orientalizing it within anthropological
terms, this thesis will demonstrate how zapatismo functions as what Felix
Guattari terms a ‟metamodel”, and opens up a system of revolutionary change
that is achieved through a practice of constant resistance.
As it is used in this thesis, fascism is explicitly not limited to statist
manifestations of totalitarian regimes, what will be termed ‟macro” fascisms.
Rather fascism represents any form of domination of one group over another.
This is explicitly not limited to totalitarian states, but also located within smaller
social groups and individuals, what Deleuze and Guattari termed
‟microfascisms”. The term fascism is intended to have an affective response and
through its use this thesis intends to illicit a critical reading that would make an
internal diagnostic mechanism, a mechanism for movements to analyse the ways
in which power operates within the movement, integral to all revolutionary
projects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - Sept 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Physical Location: This item is held in stock at Kingston University library.Keywords
- History
PhD type
- Standard route