Sitting in judgment: the working lives of judges (Hart, 2011): the story of the research project

  • Penny Darbyshire

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is an account of the research reported in a new book, SITTING IN JUDGMENT - THE WORKING LIVES OF JUDGES (Hart Publishing, 2011). This was a wide and deep observational project on the working lives of judges at every level of the English legal system, from district judges to the UK Supreme Court, in all six circuits and in family, civil and criminal courts. The project's aims were to find out what judges were like and what they did. The unique method used was work-shadowing 40 core-sample judges and interviewing a further 37. The project took over seven years and the author was allowed unlimited access to information. She sat next to the judges on the bench, travelled on circuit with High Court judges and was permitted to observe and report on the deliberations of appellate judges. The result provides an unparalleled insight. In this paper, Penny Darbyshire gives an account of the research, using this unique method, and outlines her main findings on the judges' working personalities, their approach and attitudes to work, court users and their working environment.

Conference

Conference2012 International Conference on Law and Society: Joint Annual Meetings of the Law and Society Association (LSA) and the Research Committee on Sociology of Law (International Sociological Association): Sociolegal Conversations across a Sea of Islands
Period5/06/128/06/12

Bibliographical note

Organising Body: The Law and Society Association

Keywords

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sitting in judgment: the working lives of judges (Hart, 2011): the story of the research project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this