Some ethical limitations of privatising and marketizing social care and social work provision in England for children and young people

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses the negative ethical impact of privatisation, alongside the ongoing marketisation of social care and social work provision for children and young people in England. It critically appraises the implications of a market-based formal social care system, which includes the risk-averse and often detached role of social workers within ever more fragmented sectors of care. Analysis begins with a discussion of background policy and context. The tendency towards ‘service user’ objectification and commodification are then detailed, followed by a discussion of the limiting of choice for service users. Service and social fragmentation, and the often severely restricted ‘life chances’ of many children and young people in care, are then deliberated. The concluding discussion reiterates the ethical implications of marketisation in relation to ethical frameworks, including those associated with autonomy, informed choice, social exclusion and social justice. The tendency towards children increasingly being utilised as a means to an end within business-orientated sectors of care is highlighted, alongside moral questions asked about the State’s purpose in providing a community of support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-287
Number of pages16
JournalEthics and Social Welfare
Volume13
Issue number3
Early online date1 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Children in care
  • commodification
  • fragmentation
  • privatisation
  • reduced life chances

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some ethical limitations of privatising and marketizing social care and social work provision in England for children and young people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this