Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: results from the design of a quality evaluation framework

Diogo Casanova; Antonio Moreira; Nilza Costa

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319

Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: results from the design of a quality evaluation framework

Diogo Casanova, Antonio Moreira, Nilza Costa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an ongoing research that deals with the development of a quality framework of reference for Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education. We will present the design of the methodology used for building our framework linked to a collection of internal and external references. We will also present criteria derived from this data collection phase. We will set landmarks for discussing what determines quality in Technology Enhanced Learning and what dimensions must be considered to evaluate its quality.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	893 - 902
Journal	Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Volume	29
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319
Publication status	Published - 2011

Bibliographical note

Note: This research was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (reference SFRH/BD/60295/2009). Paper from 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology 2011.

Keywords

E-learning quality criteria
Education

Access to Document

10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319

Casanova-D-29739Final published version, 555 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319

Cite this

@article{b1a2dee5702d4271b2086d33a719fca5,

title = "Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: results from the design of a quality evaluation framework",

abstract = "This paper presents an ongoing research that deals with the development of a quality framework of reference for Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education. We will present the design of the methodology used for building our framework linked to a collection of internal and external references. We will also present criteria derived from this data collection phase. We will set landmarks for discussing what determines quality in Technology Enhanced Learning and what dimensions must be considered to evaluate its quality.",

keywords = "E-learning quality criteria, Education",

author = "Diogo Casanova and Antonio Moreira and Nilza Costa",

note = "Note: This research was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (reference SFRH/BD/60295/2009). Paper from 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology 2011.",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "893 -- 902",

journal = "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences",

issn = "1877-0428",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education

T2 - results from the design of a quality evaluation framework

AU - Casanova, Diogo

AU - Moreira, Antonio

AU - Costa, Nilza

N1 - Note: This research was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (reference SFRH/BD/60295/2009). Paper from 2nd International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology 2011.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper presents an ongoing research that deals with the development of a quality framework of reference for Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education. We will present the design of the methodology used for building our framework linked to a collection of internal and external references. We will also present criteria derived from this data collection phase. We will set landmarks for discussing what determines quality in Technology Enhanced Learning and what dimensions must be considered to evaluate its quality.

AB - This paper presents an ongoing research that deals with the development of a quality framework of reference for Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education. We will present the design of the methodology used for building our framework linked to a collection of internal and external references. We will also present criteria derived from this data collection phase. We will set landmarks for discussing what determines quality in Technology Enhanced Learning and what dimensions must be considered to evaluate its quality.

KW - E-learning quality criteria

KW - Education

U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319

DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.319

M3 - Article

SN - 1877-0428

VL - 29

SP - 893

EP - 902

JO - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

JF - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

ER -

Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: results from the design of a quality evaluation framework

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this