Ten simple rules for writing a peer review

Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific progress, and it does not exist without the “peers”. Thus, it is part of our responsibility as members of the scientific community to review manuscripts (as well as poster and talk abstracts, funding proposals, theses, white papers, etc.). Doing so can be a daunting task for novice reviewers. While many years are spent increasing our scientific expertise, the training that is needed on how exactly to review these important documents is often learned through practice; at times with little guidance. In addition to those new to the process (senior graduate students all the way to junior faculty members) seeking guidance on how to approach the task of peer review; experienced reviewers can always use some “continuing education” in the form of a reminder of what is important when reviewing others’ work.