The description-experience gap in risky choice framing

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    Abstract

    We examined whether the classical framing effect observed with the Asian Disease problem could be reversed when people make decisions from experience. Ninety-five university students were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: Description, Sampling (where the participants were allowed to sample through the outcomes presented as a pack of cards) and Interactive (where the participants were invited to spread out all possible outcomes in a sample) and made three gain-framed choices and three loss-framed choices, with two filler tasks after the first three choices. The results revealed a significant interaction effect between framing and choice condition. In the Description choice condition, participants were more risk-seeking with loss-framed problems. This pattern was reversed in the Sampling choice condition where participants were more risk-seeking with gain frames. Finally, the Interactive choice condition resulted in a classic pattern of framing effect, whereby people were more risk averse in the domain of gains.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    Event38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI 2016): Recognizing and Representing Events - Philadelphia, U.S.
    Duration: 10 Aug 201613 Aug 2016

    Conference

    Conference38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI 2016): Recognizing and Representing Events
    Period10/08/1613/08/16

    Bibliographical note

    Note: This paper was published in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2016, pp.2627-2632. ISBN: 9780991196739

    Keywords

    • Business and management studies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The description-experience gap in risky choice framing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this