The hidden perils of read mapping as a quality assessment tool in genome sequencing

  • A. M. Seddon
  • , A. V. Karlyshev
  • , B. Lehri

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article provides a comparative analysis of the various methods of genome sequencing focusing on verification of the assembly quality. The results of a comparative assessment of various de novo assembly tools, as well as sequencing technologies, are presented using a recently completed sequence of the genome of Lactobacillus fermentum 3872. In particular, quality of assemblies is assessed by using CLC Genomics Workbench read mapping and Optical mapping developed by OpGen. Over-extension of contigs without prior knowledge of contig location can lead to misassembled contigs, even when commonly used quality indicators such as read mapping suggest that a contig is well assembled. Precautions must also be undertaken when using long read sequencing technology, which may also lead to misassembled contigs.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalScientific Reports
    Volume7
    Issue number43149
    Early online date22 Feb 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2017

    Keywords

    • Biological sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The hidden perils of read mapping as a quality assessment tool in genome sequencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this