Abstract
Despite the growing popularity of mixed-methods studies and considerable emphasis on the potential value of qualitative research to the trial endeavour, there remains a dearth of published studies reporting on actual contribution. This paper presents a critically reflective account of our experience of the actual value of undertaking qualitative research alongside a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided e-learning intervention for managers in an NHS Mental Health Trust to improve employee wellbeing and reduce sickness absence.
For the qualitative study we undertook 36 in-depth interviews with key informants, managers and employees. We observed and took in-depth field notes of 10 meetings involving managers and employees at the Trust, and the two qualitative researchers acted as participant observers at steering committee and monthly research team meetings. We adopted a narrative methodological orientation alongside a thematic approach to data analysis, eliciting a rich account of the complexities of managing stress at work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Trials |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 396 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 21 May 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Note: The GEM study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (project number 10/3007/06).Keywords
- Epidemiology and public health