TY - JOUR
T1 - To adopt is to adapt
T2 - the process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England
AU - Tempest, Stephanie
AU - Harries, Priscilla
AU - Kilbride, Cherry
AU - De Souza, Lorraine
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - PURPOSE:
The success of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) depends on its uptake in clinical practice. This project aimed to explore ways the ICF could be used with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team and identify key learning from the implementation process.
METHOD:
Using an action research approach, iterative cycles of observe, plan, act and evaluate were used within three phases: exploratory; innovatory and reflective. Thematic analysis was undertaken, using a model of immersion and crystallisation, on data collected via interview and focus groups, e-mail communications, minutes from relevant meetings, field notes and a reflective diary.
RESULTS:
Two overall themes were determined from the data analysis which enabled implementation. There is a need to: (1) adopt the ICF in ways that meet local service needs; and (2) adapt the ICF language and format.
CONCLUSIONS:
The empirical findings demonstrate how to make the ICF classification a clinical reality. First, we need to adopt the ICF as a vehicle to implement local service priorities e.g. to structure a multidisciplinary team report, thus enabling ownership of the implementation process. Second, we need to adapt the ICF terminology and format to make it acceptable for use by clinicians.
AB - PURPOSE:
The success of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) depends on its uptake in clinical practice. This project aimed to explore ways the ICF could be used with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team and identify key learning from the implementation process.
METHOD:
Using an action research approach, iterative cycles of observe, plan, act and evaluate were used within three phases: exploratory; innovatory and reflective. Thematic analysis was undertaken, using a model of immersion and crystallisation, on data collected via interview and focus groups, e-mail communications, minutes from relevant meetings, field notes and a reflective diary.
RESULTS:
Two overall themes were determined from the data analysis which enabled implementation. There is a need to: (1) adopt the ICF in ways that meet local service needs; and (2) adapt the ICF language and format.
CONCLUSIONS:
The empirical findings demonstrate how to make the ICF classification a clinical reality. First, we need to adopt the ICF as a vehicle to implement local service priorities e.g. to structure a multidisciplinary team report, thus enabling ownership of the implementation process. Second, we need to adapt the ICF terminology and format to make it acceptable for use by clinicians.
KW - Allied health professions and studies
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22372376
U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2012.658489
DO - 10.3109/09638288.2012.658489
M3 - Article
C2 - 22372376
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 34
SP - 1686
EP - 1694
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 20
ER -