Abstract
The question of the meaning of Heritage has evolved for more than two
hundred years. Calls for a common understanding of Heritage have developed
extensively in the last four decades leading to the incorporation of diverse
practices in its management. This shift in management could be perceived in a
positive sense as adaptive and progressive or alternatively in a negative sense
as extensive and opportunistic. The factors influencing the practice and theory
of Heritage management keep increasing under these layers, leading to the
inclusion of various other fields. This leads to the underlying importance of
Heritage being defined as a multi-disciplinary field.
The study identifies that there is a lack of coherent understanding among
experts and locals on how buildings of historical importance can be listed and
managed in a participatory manner. There is a need for a platform for direct
communication between stakeholders involved in the management of these
buildings of local historical importance.
Recently, with the introduction of Localism Act 2011, National Planning Policy
Framework 2012, Enterprise and regulatory Reform Act 2013, the gaps and the
issues identified at the beginning of this research in 2009 are corroborated.
These acts and guidance were introduced to streamline the planning system
and in relation to this research will help in having a linear process in Heritage
management. It supports the idea of Big Society where more power is given to
citizens and helps in moving towards a participatory approach to planning.
Through decentralisation, as the government gives power back to the people, it
is important to understand that each stakeholder has an important role to play in
any development. Hence stakeholder collaboration is the key to success of any
project.
The aims of this research are: to understand the decision-making processes in
the management of historic buildings in London and to propose a conceptual
framework to assist in participatory decision-making. This will aid the Heritage
Partnership Agreements (HPA) proposed by the UK government. The literature
review explores the concepts of Heritage management, Heritage production
model, decision-making, participatory planning and community engagement and a conceptual framework is developed. Two case studies from London, The
Brunswick and Brixton Market, are conducted for data collection. Rigorous data
collection and analysis using NVivo is employed. Research findings from these
exploratory studies confirm that there is a need for a common platform for
stakeholder interaction and participatory planning; and different stakeholders
have different priorities leading to the need of a shared vision. There exists a
gap between communities' desired management of the building and the
stakeholders' expectation.
This study generates new knowledge about the needs for attaining stakeholder
engagement in the management of Heritage. This study also offers a
methodological contribution that could be applied to a similar study on Heritage
in different cities and countries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - Apr 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Physical Location: This item is held in stock at Kingston University library.Keywords
- Town and country planning
PhD type
- Standard route