Twelve tips for ethical approval for research in health professions education

Sharon Freitag, Vicki Leblanc, Eileen Egan-Lee, Lindsay Baker, Scott Reeves

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: A growing number of faculty are engaging in research in health professions education. Suggestions continue to be made in the literature for a clear and less onerous pathway for the ethical review of this work. AIM: We aim to provide advice about the ethics application process for those conducting research in health professions education. METHODS: We used critical reflection of our experiences as research ethics board (REB) members, applying for, reviewing and consulting about the ethics application process in both UK and Canadian health contexts in addition to evidence and advice that is available in the literature to inform the tips provided. RESULTS: Twelve tips are offered to help faculty understand and navigate through the ethics application process. CONCLUSION: Health professionals have an important role to play in advancing the field of health professions education, and despite issues identified with current review pathways, REB review is in place to ensure that this work is undertaken safely and ethically. We believe the tips offered in this article will help faculty identify, and devise plans to address, some ethical issues that are common in health professions education research
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)268-272
    JournalMedical Teacher
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • Health services research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Twelve tips for ethical approval for research in health professions education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this