Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.

Robert J. Koester; Kenneth B Chiacchia; Charles R Twardy; Donald C Cooper; John R Frost; R Quincy Robe

doi:10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016

Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.

Robert J. Koester
, Kenneth B Chiacchia
, Charles R Twardy
, Donald C Cooper
, John R Frost
, R Quincy Robe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Although additional experiments are required for the medium- and low-visibility search objects and in the dry-domain ecoregion, we suggest search planners use the following correction factors to convert field-measured Rd to an estimate of the effective sweep width (W): high-visibility W = 1.8 × Rd; medium-visibility W = 1.6 × Rd; and low-visibility W = 1.1 × Rd.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	132-142
Journal	Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Volume	25
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016
Publication status	Published - Jun 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016

Cite this

@article{8e4dc862dee64c92a5672d2a95cffb3f,

title = "Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.",

abstract = "Although additional experiments are required for the medium- and low-visibility search objects and in the dry-domain ecoregion, we suggest search planners use the following correction factors to convert field-measured Rd to an estimate of the effective sweep width (W): high-visibility W = 1.8 × Rd; medium-visibility W = 1.6 × Rd; and low-visibility W = 1.1 × Rd.",

author = "Koester, \{Robert J.\} and Chiacchia, \{Kenneth B\} and Twardy, \{Charles R\} and Cooper, \{Donald C\} and Frost, \{John R\} and Robe, \{R Quincy\}",

year = "2014",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "132--142",

journal = "Wilderness and Environmental Medicine",

issn = "1080-6032",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.

AU - Koester, Robert J.

AU - Chiacchia, Kenneth B

AU - Twardy, Charles R

AU - Cooper, Donald C

AU - Frost, John R

AU - Robe, R Quincy

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Although additional experiments are required for the medium- and low-visibility search objects and in the dry-domain ecoregion, we suggest search planners use the following correction factors to convert field-measured Rd to an estimate of the effective sweep width (W): high-visibility W = 1.8 × Rd; medium-visibility W = 1.6 × Rd; and low-visibility W = 1.1 × Rd.

AB - Although additional experiments are required for the medium- and low-visibility search objects and in the dry-domain ecoregion, we suggest search planners use the following correction factors to convert field-measured Rd to an estimate of the effective sweep width (W): high-visibility W = 1.8 × Rd; medium-visibility W = 1.6 × Rd; and low-visibility W = 1.1 × Rd.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24462331

U2 - 10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.wem.2013.09.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 24462331

SN - 1080-6032

VL - 25

SP - 132

EP - 142

JO - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

JF - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

IS - 2

ER -

Use of the visual range of detection to estimate effective sweep width for land search and rescue based on 10 detection experiments in North America.

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this