Using codes of ethics for disabled children who communicate non-verbally - some challenges and implications for social workers

Malcolm Carey, Katherine Anne Prynallt-Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article evaluates the use of professional codes of ethics by social workers specialising in work with disabled children who communicate non-verbally. It draws upon phenomenological interviews and other studies to highlight challenges faced by practitioners in a complex role which demands high-levels of skills and knowledge. Supporting other research, codes of ethics were rarely utilised by practitioners who typically maintain a vague appreciation while often compelled to focus upon pragmatic and quick responses to a complex role. Despite this, it is argued that principle-based frameworks embedded within codes of ethics carry important political implications. These include the potential to strengthen existing utilitarian and bioethical discourses embedded in policy or dominant professional narratives, and which can at times marginalise or exclude disabled children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-83
Number of pages6
JournalEthics and Social Welfare
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date9 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • bioethics
  • disability
  • ethical codes
  • exclusion
  • social work
  • utilitarianism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using codes of ethics for disabled children who communicate non-verbally - some challenges and implications for social workers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this