TY - JOUR
T1 - When formal organisations meet informal relations in Soviet Lithuania
T2 - action nets, networks and boundary objects in the construction of the Lithuanian Sea Museum
AU - Rindzeviciute, Egle
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This study considers organisation in countries under the Soviet
regime. The focus is on the creation of the Sea Museum in Klaipėda from the 1960s to the 1980s, a massive undertaking that required huge capital investments, use of rare foreign materials, cooperation between many different sectors (Soviet military, heritage preservation, seaport management, seagoing fishing vessels and zoos in Eastern bloc countries), and many innovations in designing the local sea aquarium system. The whole project was formally illegal: there was an all-union wide restriction on building so-called 'spectator venues'. This article analyses the roles of formal and informal
relations in the construction of the Sea Museum as a project concerning the public good. It suggests that the presence of informality did not undermine formal organising in the overtly centralised Soviet regime. Belonging to formal organisations was an important resource for actors who constructed action
nets that went beyond the boundaries of these organisations. Although it is widely known that the successful functioning of formal organisations often depended on informal relations, this point raises complex questions about the identity and uniqueness of the Soviet system.
AB - This study considers organisation in countries under the Soviet
regime. The focus is on the creation of the Sea Museum in Klaipėda from the 1960s to the 1980s, a massive undertaking that required huge capital investments, use of rare foreign materials, cooperation between many different sectors (Soviet military, heritage preservation, seaport management, seagoing fishing vessels and zoos in Eastern bloc countries), and many innovations in designing the local sea aquarium system. The whole project was formally illegal: there was an all-union wide restriction on building so-called 'spectator venues'. This article analyses the roles of formal and informal
relations in the construction of the Sea Museum as a project concerning the public good. It suggests that the presence of informality did not undermine formal organising in the overtly centralised Soviet regime. Belonging to formal organisations was an important resource for actors who constructed action
nets that went beyond the boundaries of these organisations. Although it is widely known that the successful functioning of formal organisations often depended on informal relations, this point raises complex questions about the identity and uniqueness of the Soviet system.
KW - Sociology
M3 - Article
SN - 1392-2343
VL - 15
SP - 107
EP - 134
JO - Lithuanian Historical Studies
JF - Lithuanian Historical Studies
ER -